28 October 2005

A day long remembered

I would like to take some time off from my normal rantings and sarcasm to go to a somewhat more serious tone. (gasp!)

Today we celebrate the anniversary of the birth of my esteemed contributor. He turns 83 today, at least emotionally. Which would make him a couple years older than I.

Those of us fortunate enough to call him friend, or family member (or "daddy" to a certain psychotic orange tabby), are certainly glad that another birthday of his is upon us, since, at least for a time, it looked like he wouldn't have too many.

Although we live in separate cities, we hang out nearly every day, whether it is a simple chat on the phone, but more often than not it is when we are battling crime in Paragon City as part of Battle Plan (Though soon do-gooders will be crushed beneath our heels). We may not see each other in person each day, but I think that just having the friendship alone is enough. And while playing City of Heroes we may be separate heroes but we'll always be part of a team.

So I expect to see several, several more of these celebrations for him. And you can expect to see several, several more posts from him beginning with "I know you haven't heard from me in awhile.." (I've been dying to get that one out).

Happy birthday my friend. You look like a monkey and smell like one too.

(P.S. If the cake is good and you're not offended by the monkey remark save me some cake)

26 October 2005

Walgreens beware

Ahh, one of the best days of the year is coming up.

Right now you're looking at the day this was posted and must be thinking "Halloween, one of the best days of the year?" Well actually no, but it is related.

It's funny that October, November, and December are so closely linked to their respective holidays, all of which come toward the end of the month. In October it's scary-this and frightening-that. All month tv networks show scary movies about once a night. Grocery stores are full of aisles with costumes smelling of cheap plastic.

Never mind that October has a lot more going for it. October is a sports fan's dream, with all the major professional sports (NBA, NFL, NHL, and MLB) playing in one form or another. There's the end of daylight savings (at least until next year when is starts happening in November). And my fellow contributor even celebrates his birthday in October.

So as an adult, no, I really don't look forward too much to Halloween. So what, do you ask, is one of the best days of the year coming up?

November 1. The day stores selling Halloween candy at largely discounted prices. Look out, Walgreens!

19 October 2005

Tonight's top story..cable news stinks

"This is CNN," the immortal words of James Earl Jones, lampooned and imitated throughout popular culture. Ask anyone what they know about the Cable News Network, and it's likely that they'll at least respond, "Hmm, CNN... oh, you mean like (in a deep voice) this...is CNN?"

Introduced in 1980 by media mogul Ted Turner and "some other guy," CNN has become what is probably the most well-known and well-respected news institutions in the world. Sadly, in my humble opinion, it has not shown it in the past year.

I seem to recall at one point CNN being the "rebel" in the news world. Up until that time, it was the big three covering the news: ABC, CBS, and NBC would all have their top guys there, who were probably throwing spitballs and putting "kick me" signs on the reporter from CNN. "Hey, look there's that nerd from CNN. Let's tell the rebels that he is hoping the government crushes them! Heh heh!"

But CNN grew, they started taking their vitamins and drinking their milk, and it wasn't long before they were pushing around the other guys. It was probably in the early 90s, with the "First" Gulf War, when they gained the most popularity. They had the videos of the missiles hitting the buildings. They were cool. They even were being aped in popular culture, using usually thinly-veiled references, like calling a news network "GNN" or what not. The short lived show The Critic featured Duke Phillips and his media empire, which closely resembled that of Ted Turner; he even had his own news network.. that's right, PNN.

CNN was almost a staple for me in my college days. Well, that, but mostly their sister station, CNN Headline News, which uses a cyclic 30 minute format to recap all the day's news. I remember how cool I thought it was when Headline News started their "news ticker" feature to scroll big news stories and facts across the bottom of the screen. I loved how I could come back to the dorm after a long day of classes and be able to get caught up with the news in only a half hour.

But somehow, some way, CNN lost its sense of direction. Whereas I used to find the station informative, I find it largely opinionated now, reporting mainly on the "flavor of the month" as it were. Even Headline News I find to be out of whack. Almost a "CNN-Lite." I think it has largely to do with the upstart news networks of Fox News (the only news is what we tell you, dammit!!)and MSNBC (you'd think with NBC being around for so long we'd know what we are doing). Fox News adopted the attitude of its network cousin.. it's news, but with an attitude! They seemed to find the snippiest reporters from around the U.S. and gave them jobs. MSNBC is there too, although it seems to me they are the puppy dogs of cable news and follow the crowd. I also get the impression their anchors are rejects from other networks and failed shows.

With viewership transitioning to the other networks, CNN seems to have altered their programming and way of thinking. Sadly now its hard to tell them apart from everyone else. I don't get news anymore; I get a panel discussion on a big story. The funny thing about my local cable provider is that CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC are all back-to-back in the lineup. So I can literally turn on one station and then switch between the three and get the same exact story, only the "headline" is different. CNN displayed "The Blame Game," while 2 stations up, Fox displayed "Shifting the Blame." It's eerie.

When I choose to watch cable news, I honestly don't want to be told what news story I should be concerned about. Where's the global news? Happenings around the world? The networks don't care. They'd rather talk about day 23 of the missing person in the Bahamas, and how local law enforcement stinks there. Now don't get me wrong. I feel for that person and their family. It must be horrible what they're going through. But guess what, dozens, maybe hundreds of people are reported missing per day. What about them? Don't they deserve some attention? Instead of spending 2 hours discussing one person, how about going through a whole list of missing persons cases? Even toss in a number to call in with info. And don't even get me started on the whole "husband who wanted to take his wife off of life support" story a few months ago. Thankfully I've erased most of that info from my memory. What a debacle that was.

This is probably why more people are turning to the Internet for their daily news fix. They can pick and choose what stories they want information about, more often than not without some bozo wanting to blame whatever it is on a government official or scapegoat.

So, I say, this is CNN? Hardly. A mere shadow of the drive and professionalism that made it what it is. Oh, and Fox News, you're not helping. Not everything is a conspiracy or the fault of one person or another. Nor is every news story the subject of endless debate. Sometimes news is just news. I'd like to have that back.

14 October 2005

I've been saying it for years!

The following is from the Associated Press. All you really have to do is go out shopping to validate the information in the article.

WASHINGTON - Americans' fast-paced, high-tech existence has taken a toll on the civil in society.
From road rage in the morning commute to high decibel cell-phone conversations that ruin dinner out, men and women behaving badly has become the hallmark of a hurry-up world. An increasing informality -- flip-flops at the White House, even -- combined with self-absorbed communication gadgets and a demand for instant gratification have strained common courtesies to the breaking point.
"All of these things lead to a world with more stress, more chances for people to be rude to each other," said Peter Post, a descendent of etiquette expert Emily Post and an instructor on business manners through the Emily Post Institute in Burlington, Vt.
In some cases, the harried single parent has replaced the traditional nuclear family and there's little time to teach the basics of polite living, let alone how to hold a knife and fork, according to Post.
A slippage in manners is obvious to many Americans. Nearly 70 percent questioned in an Associated Press-Ipsos poll said people are ruder than they were 20 or 30 years ago. The trend is noticed in large and small places alike, although more urban people report bad manners, 74 percent, then do people in rural areas, 67 percent.
Peggy Newfield, founder and president of Personal Best, said the generation that came of age in the times-a-changin' 1960s and 1970s are now parents who don't stress the importance of manners, such as opening a door for a female.
So it was no surprise to Newfield that those children wouldn't understand how impolite it was to wear flip-flops to a White House meeting with the president -- as some members of the Northwestern women's lacrosse team did in the summer.
A whopping 93 percent in the AP-Ipsos poll faulted parents for failing to teach their children well.
"Parents are very much to blame," said Newfield, whose Atlanta-based company started teaching etiquette to young people and now focuses on corporate employees. "And the media."
Sulking athletes and boorish celebrities grab the headlines while television and Hollywood often glorify crude behavior.
"It's not like the old shows 'Father Knows Best,"' said Norm Demers, 47, of Sutton, Mass. "People just copy it. How do you change it?" Demers would like to see more family friendly television but isn't holding his breath.
Nearly everyone has a story of the rude or the crude, but fewer are willing to fess up to boorish behavior themselves.
Only 13 percent in the poll would admit to making an obscene gesture while driving; only 8 percent said they had used their cell phones in a loud or annoying manner around others. But 37 percent in the survey of 1,001 adults questioned Aug. 22-23 said they had used a swear word in public.
Yvette Sienkiewicz, 41, a claims adjustor from Wilmington, Del., recalled in frustration how a bigger boy cut in front of her 8-year-old son as he waited in line to play a game at the local Chuck E. Cheese.
"It wasn't my thing to say something to the little boy," said Sienkiewicz, who remembered that the adult accompanying the child never acknowledged what he had done. In the AP-Ipsos poll, 38 percent said they have asked someone to stop behaving rudely.
More and more, manners are taught less and less.
Carole Krohn, 71, a retired school bus driver in Deer Park, Wash., said she has seen children's behavior deteriorate over the years, including one time when a boy tossed a snowball at the back of another driver's head. In this litigious society, she argued, a grown-up risks trouble correcting someone else's kid.
One solution for bad behavior "is to put a kid off in the middle of the road. Nowadays all people want to do is sue, to say you're to blame, get you fired," Krohn said.
Krohn, who often greeted students by name and with a hearty "good morning," once was asked by a child if she got tired of offering pleasantries.
Sienkiewicz, whose job requires hours in a car, said she tries to avoid rush-hour traffic because of drivers with a me-first attitude. The most common complaint about rudeness in the poll was aggressive or reckless driving, with 91 percent citing it as the most frequent discourtesy.
Margaret Hahn-Dupont, a 39-year-old law professor from Oradell, N.J., noticed that some of her students showed little respect for authority and felt free to express their discontent and demand better grades.
Close on the heels of the baby boomers are the affluent teens and young adults who have known nothing but the conveniences of computers and cell phones, devices that take them away from face-to-face encounters and can be downright annoying in a crowd.
"They got a lot of things and feel entitled to get a lot of things," said Hahn-Dupont.
Bernard F. Scanlon, 79, of Sayville, N.Y., would like to see one railroad car set aside for cell phone users to ensure peace and quiet for the rest. Amtrak has taken a stab at that by banning cell phones and other loud devices in one car of some trains, especially on chatty Northeast and West Coast routes.
But if those trains are sold out, the Quiet Car service is suspended and anything goes.
How rude.

12 October 2005

Gone are the glory days of cable

Cable television was so cool when my family first got it. All these networks dedicated to "premium" programming... a station called Home Box Office that showed feature films 24/7, and best of all, no commercials.

I remember getting a little annoyed when commercials started creeping into these cable networks. After all, we're paying you guys an extra charge to get access to your network, why do we have to watch commercials like I'm watching a common local network?

Soon after, commercials were the norm. Premium television started to feel more like "somewhat special" television. And the strange thing was, all these networks dedicated to one particular subject... started to deviate from their programming. CNN has devolved considerably (something I'll discuss in another post); MTV, where music videos were born, has nary a music video to be found. What's happened?

The big "music" networks.. MTV, VH1, and to some extent, the country music station CMT, are barely even music-themed anymore. I admit I haven't seen too much of CMT, so I guess it's not fair to put it in the category. After all, what little I've seen does actually have music videos. And although they have their own reality tv show, its about being a country music star. But MTV and VH1, shame shame. MTV has their famous Video Music Awards, but where's the video music? Maybe early in the morning or late at night. The rest of it is filled with reality tv shows, Punk'd, and quite possibly one of the worst shows I've EVER seen, the Andy Milonakis Show. MTV had to even create a new station, MTV2, to fit videos in. And VH1, I don't even know if they show videos anymore. Most of the time all I happen to pass by is one of those "Top 100" shows or "Best Week Ever" shows where washed-up "comedians" think they can pass judgment on and make fun of everyday events.

The "movie" networks.. HBO, Cinemax, Showtime.. they still have movies, but on the "premium premium television" (i.e., digital cable and satellite) they have 10 different stations, so they can afford to deviate. These stations have taken it upon themselves to produce original programming that doesn't have the constraints of network TV. Say hello to unadulterated violence, language, and sexual content! And the critics are eating these shows up, so much so that they're being nominated at the Emmys and Golden Globes. There was a time where they had to make do with the Cable Ace Awards. (remember those?) Then they release the 13-episode seasons of these shows on DVD for largely inflated prices. Take that, free TV!

Other networks that were largely movie and/or old tv show related are joining in on the original programming bandwagon, such as FX and USA. I seem to recall a time where USA was mostly just showing "edited for television" movies along with maybe some sitcoms. Even ESPN has done original programming. But it is sports-themed, so I guess that's something.

There's so many channels out there that actually do offer strictly-themed content. Home Shopping, obviously.. Food TV, The Weather Channel, and the My-Husband-is-Secretly-An-Abusive-Mass-Murderer Movie Network. (Which has since been renamed the Lifetime Network. Ha!) I fear the day where I turn on the Home Shopping Network to find a reality tv show where they help some woman addicted to shopping networks.

Digital cable and satellite television is the new "premium" television, but it sure as heck doesn't feel like it. 10 different HBO networks, 10 different Showtimes.. the 24/7 Aquarium channel. (ok I made that one up but I wouldn't be surprised if there is one) Why are we paying the costs we are for premium TV? Seems to me we're at the point where cable networks are becoming so mainstream that most of them should be offered for free, or at least for a largely reduced price. It's all the same, anyway.

09 October 2005

Thank You Notes

Hello all, I know its been awhile since I have talked to yall. Things have been kinda hectic in my life lately, so I have been trying to take it easy. The operative word being is "trying". Like many of you, I have different ways of distracting myself from the stresses of life. In fact it has occurred me to create a list thanking people that allow me to relax and be entertained. The order I put these people doesn't not reflect any importance or rank. I am pretty sure the people that I mention will never see this blog. Living or dead I decided to give my props to the following.

Alton Brown: I would like thank you for giving me confidence in cooking. I am a bachelor (I am not proud of this) and I have to be able to cook, and good for that matter. When I first saw your show, it opened a new world of possibilities and renewed my interest in science. I watch your show regularly (even if its a repeat) and read your books and I am constantly learning. I hope the skill you teach me will lead me to share with others. I seriously doubt I will ever be able to learn enough to snatch the 1/4 teaspoon of kosher salt from your palm.

Joss Whedon: Thank you for creating several fantastic t.v. shows. Years ago, I remember watching "Buffy: The Vampire Slayer", but not on a regular basis. Later on, I had a great desire to watch, but due to local cable company wouldn't carry the network that it broadcasted on. The same goes with "Angel." I was aware of it, but was unable to see it for the same reason. That all changed when your shows went to dvds, and I have watched them over and over. Now, I have all the seasons to both shows, and I find myself constantly watching them, and I never will get tired of them.

Video Game Designers/Programmers: Thank you for allowing me to have away to vent all my daily frustrations out in a safe manner. If I've had a bad day at work, I can always can come home and play one of your prized creations to help me relax. Thanks to yall I can choose to be a superhero, villain, or a spy with a sniper rifle hunting down French talking mimes. I don't care what the critics say about the violent content of your games, I find it a form of therapy. I just want to say keep up the good work and don't let the nay-sayers get yall down.

John Montague: Thank you for creating the sandwich. If you weren't having a good game (poker, I think) on that fateful day, I don't think you would come up with that one handed compact meal. Like I mentioned before, I like to cook, but I have to be honest sometimes I come home and I don't feel like cooking. Thanks to you I can just make a quick sandwich with some light side (a quick pasta salad from a box). This simple meal will satisfy me and keep my take-out spending to a minimum.

Comedians: Thank you for the laughter, especially any time I laughed in the past few weeks. Laughter is truly good medicine and it doesn't require any prescription which is a plus. Lately, I have relied on comedy to keep me from dwelling on sad events that have transpired lately in my life. I would like to create a list of comedians to thank individually, but I am so afraid I would leave a person or comedy troop out. I applaud of all the work so far and look forward to many more laughs.

I think its time to wrap it up. This list is by no means complete and I don't think it will ever be. Maybe, when I think of anymore deserving people I will amend the list. I believe this post was more helpful to me than anything. I know some of my selections were odd, but I think they were honest. Thank you for attention and time in reading my blogs.

04 October 2005

Make mine Marvel?

The folks that publish Marvel Comics very recently got a loan approved that will allow them to produce their own movies. Here is an excerpt from the article.


Marvel Entertainment -- previously Marvel Enterprises -- is set to announce Tuesday its name change and completion of its loan package, and also will
divulge that superheroes Captain America, the Avengers, Nick Fury, Black
Panther, Ant-Man, Cloak & Dagger, Dr. Strange, Hawkeye, Power Pack and
Shang-Chi will get the feature-film treatment.
Paramount Pictures, under a deal announced in April shortly after Brad Gray took the helm of the studio, will distribute and market the films, the first of which will be released in 2008 or possibly sooner.
Marvel chairman and CEO Avi Arad said he officially will begin attaching scriptwriters to all 10 projects beginning Wednesday and that, though he has a wish list, he's unsure which movie will be released first."No character before its time. The scripts will dictate which is first," Arad said, adding, "I cannot wait to tell Captain America's story. It's a doozy of a story."In April, Marvel said it would budget each film in the range of $45 million-$180 million, though Arad since has narrowed that to $50 million-$165 million.


Okay, makes sense. They've been releasing a lot of movies of their characters in the last few years. But a couple of things struck me about the news. Before I get into that, though, let me go into a tad bit of backstory.

Marvel isn't like DC Comics (home to Batman, Superman, and others). Rights to DC Comics characters essentially belong to Warner Brothers, meaning that if a movie is to be made about a character, WB will release the movie. Not so for Marvel. When movie rights started becoming a hot commodity, Marvel characters went every which direction. 20th Century Fox got Fantastic Four, Daredevil, and X-Men. The Hulk went to Universal. After a long legal battle, Spider-Man went to Sony. Other characters went to various other studios. So, Marvel doesn't necessarily benefit from this new loan when it comes to the big franchises, because, well, those studios still own the rights.

The big thing that got me about the announcement is the list of titles Marvel is proudly announcing feature films of. Now, people with good knowledge of Marvel characters, like myself, will recognize the names. But other people will likely look at that list and say, "Huh? Power Who?" I highly doubt there's folks out there saying "Wow, when am I going to get the chance to see Shang-Chi brought to the screen?"

For those who don't know who these characters are, let me give you a brief rundown. You can also look the characters up on Wikipedia.

  1. Captain America: Probably the most widely known. If you don't know the character, there is a good chance you may have heard the name. Personally I'd like to see a well-made version of this, preferably set in World War II.
  2. The Avengers: "Earth's Mightiest Heroes." Captain America, Iron Man, and Thor are just some of the members of this team. Quite frankly I see this as being hard to pull off.
  3. Nick Fury: Head of a secret agency who has been given an eternal-youth type formula. You might have seen David Hasselhoff play him in a TV movie version in the late 90s.
  4. Black Panther: Leader of the African nation of Wakanda, and crimefighter. Think Batman, if he were President of the United States. Wesley "Blade" Snipes has reportedly been interested in the role, which I think would be good for him, before he sinks into direct-to-video status.
  5. Ant-Man: A guy that can shrink himself to the size of an ant. That's pretty much it. Been awhile since we've seen a good "shrinking" movie though.
  6. Cloak & Dagger: Teen runaways who got their powers from an experimental drug. they have "dark" and "light" related powers.
  7. Dr. Strange: Former surgeon turned Earth's "Sorcerer Supreme." Movies/TV shows about sorcery can be hard to pull off without being cheesy. Fun fact: my childhood dentist was named Dr. Strange.
  8. Hawkeye: An archer with a bunch of trick arrows. I'm sure if they dress him up to look like Legolas, then they might just draw in the female crowd.
  9. Power Pack: A bunch of 8-year-olds given their powers by a dying alien, and fly around in a talking spaceship. The whole kids-as-superheroes thing has been done twice this year with that Lavagirl and Shark Boy movie along with Sky High, with mixed results. Do we really need another one?
  10. Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu: Well see, there's this guy named Shang-Chi, and his kung fu is the best! Um, ok.. that's about all I know. They could literally take a random kung fu movie, slap the name Shang-Chi on it and no one would know the difference.

There you have it. Marvel is gambling on mostly a bunch of second-string characters, most of whom haven't even had their own comic book titles in quite some time. And to slap a budget of up to $165 million on these movies? On The Avengers maybe. I know Marvel has already exhausted most of their "flagship" characters, but there are other Marvel characters that deserve a movie more than Shang-Chi or Power Pack. Like Iron Man maybe? Silver Surfer?

If Marvel does move forward with these films, and it very much looks like they are, they sure as heck should make sure they get the movies right. Talk with writers who have done some of the character's comic books. Talk with fans of the series. Get a story that everyone can agree with. Get a director who knows the character(s). Because quite frankly, in the recent past Marvel has gotten "trendy" directors or just people who were available at the time. Or they try to go in somewhat of a different direction with the character.

Remember The Hulk? Everyone was expecting "Hulk Smash!" with a big green monster tearing through the city. What they got was a psychological drama which happened to have some action in it. Fantastic Four got Tim Story, who directed Taxi and Barbershop? Thankfully for him, he got lucky. The truly great Marvel films have had passionate directors behind them. Sam Raimi, director of the Spider-Man movies, has been a fan of the character since childhood. Daredevil director Mark Steven Johnson was also a fan. (Oh, and before you go and say "Daredevil was a good movie? What are you, joking," see the director's cut of the movie.)

Also by the time these movies begin to be released, the market may be oversaturated with comic book films. "Comic book adaptation" has practically become its own genre along with "comedy," "action," and "drama." By 2008, Warner Brothers will have released the new Superman movie, and sequels to X-Men, Sin City, Spider-Man, and Fantastic Four will likely have been released, along with the possible sequel to The Hulk and a standalone Wolverine movie with Hugh Jackman.

I'm happy that Marvel is enjoying success now. I've been a fan of their characters for awhile. Sadly though I think the power is going to their head (as already evidenced by their outrageous lawsuit against City of Heroes). Marvel should seriously listen to the catchphrase that their flagship character Spider-Man lives by: "With great power comes great responsibility."